OSU Navigation Bar

The Ohio State University University Libraries Knowledge Bank

The Knowledge Bank is scheduled for regular maintenance on Sunday, April 20th, 8:00 am to 12:00 pm EDT. During this time users will not be able to register, login, or submit content.

Prosperity, consumption, and the environmental Kuznets curve: Implications for forest conservation

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/37094

Show simple item record

Files Size Format View
Mills_HayesForum2009.pdf 910.7Kb PDF View/Open

dc.contributor.advisor Marschall, Elizabeth A.
dc.creator Mills, Julianne H.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-06-04T16:09:57Z
dc.date.available 2009-06-04T16:09:57Z
dc.date.issued 2009-04
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1811/37094
dc.description Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences (FAES): 2nd Place (The Ohio State University Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum) en
dc.description.abstract Many conservationists contend that economic growth and conservation are incompatible goals. Others contest this viewpoint, arguing that wealthier countries have the luxury of investing more heavily in conservation. Under this assumption, one might expect a U-shaped relationship between per capita wealth and the proportion of a country’s forest that is preserved over time. This relationship, called the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC), predicts the following: as per capita income increases, measures of environmental health should first decrease, then rise again after a certain point, such that the richest nation-states should have superior environmental health. Previously, I examined the evidence for this EKC among 35 tropical forest countries. To do so, I introduced the use of quantile regression and spatial filtering, addressing problems of heteroskedasticity and spatial autocorrelation common to EKC analyses. The new application of these methods to EKC analysis revealed some evidence to suggest the presence of an EKC—that is, rich countries did appear to protect a greater proportion of their forests, a proxy measure for biodiversity. However, a closer examination of conservation practices and environmental indicators within those countries that drove initial support suggests that wealth is not a reliable indicator of improved conservation practice. I show that this relationship is driven by differences between countries, in particular, their habits of resource production and consumption. Here, I build upon the prior analysis, explicitly incorporating consumption of forest products through the use of production, import, and export data. I perform two separate analyses, one which incorporates all forest products (including wood used for fuel) and one which excludes fuelwood. Because low income countries use more fuelwood than any other group, its inclusion reveals consumption-driven losses at both income extremes. However, when fuel is excluded, all evidence that being rich promotes conservation is eliminated. Rich countries may practice preservation within their borders, but they appropriate resources from poorer countries to fuel their consumption. These findings suggest, on one hand, that increasing prosperity may play a key role in promoting conservation, as alleviation of poverty would decrease the reliance on fuelwood for heating and cooking. Conversely, unhindered economic growth increases consumption at the expense of global conservation. Taken together, these findings have significant implications for both economic and conservation policies worldwide. Simple application of the EKC theory, which suggests constant economic growth as the best practice for conservation, is clearly unwarranted. On the contrary, these findings suggest that initial support for growth and poverty alleviation in low income countries might best be matched by policies which acknowledge limits to growth and strive for steady state economies amongst high income countries. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.relation.ispartofseries 2009 Edward F. Hayes Graduate Research Forum. 23rd en
dc.subject Consumption en
dc.subject Environmental policy en
dc.subject Poverty en
dc.subject biodiversity en
dc.subject Global sustainability en
dc.subject Economic prosperity en
dc.title Prosperity, consumption, and the environmental Kuznets curve: Implications for forest conservation en
dc.type Article en
dc.description.embargo A one-year embargo was granted for this item. en
dc.rights.cc Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported en_US
dc.rights.ccuri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ en_US
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License:
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported