OSU Navigation Bar

The Ohio State University University Libraries Knowledge Bank

Civil Rights and Civil Wrongs: Race, Gender and Tort Law

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/31777

Show full item record

Files Size Format View Description
kbdirect_Chamallas.html 518bytes HTML View/Open Presentation
Chamallas_bio.pdf 11.26Kb PDF View/Open Biography
Chamallas_image.jpg 5.566Kb JPEG image Thumbnail of Civil Rights and Civil Wrongs: Race, Gender and Tort Law Image

Title: Civil Rights and Civil Wrongs: Race, Gender and Tort Law
Creators: Chamallas, Martha
Issue Date: 2007-03-12
Publisher: Ohio State University
Series/Report no.: The Ohio State University Distinguished Lecture
Abstract: Very few persons see a connection between "ordinary" tort claims and claims for violations of civil rights. Historically, the two domains have developed separately, and civil rights attorneys are a separate and distinct group from personal injury litigators. Issues of social justice - particularly the equitable treatment of women and minority social groups - rarely surface in personal injury litigation with its seemingly neutral rules for determining duty, causation, and damages. I argue, however, that this standard account of the law is flawed and that the shape of tort law has been affected by the social identity of the parties and prevailing cultural views on race and gender. We see the influence of race and gender when courts interpret a broad concept, such as the standard for "outrageous" conduct, which determines liability in intentional tort claims for domestic violence and for misconduct in the workplace. Considerations of gender and race have also affected judgments of causation in "wrongful birth" cases and in recent lead paint cases brought on behalf of poor and minority children who suffer cognitive injuries. Most pervasively, race and gender continue to play an important role in setting a value on injuries, through the methods experts and courts use to calculate damages for future loss. I argue that it is time to connect civil rights to tort law and to import civil rights and human rights principles into the basic legal doctrine governing the trial of ordinary civil claims. The important public policies behind civil rights statutes should be permitted to migrate to torts to inform the law's - and our -- understanding of dignity, responsibility, and value. I will attempt to show that this is the kind of tort reform that may proceed incrementally from both courts and legislatures and would thus follow the best tradition of the common law
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/31777
Rights: This object may be copyright-protected. Permission to reuse, publish or reproduce the object must be obtained from the object publisher or copyright holder.
Bookmark and Share
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License:
Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported