Ask: Research and Methods. Volume 4, Issue 2 (1996)

Permanent URI for this collection

https://kb.osu.edu/handle/1811/69433


Problem sponsora sondażu w oczach respondentów CBOS w roku 1992 [Knowledge about a sponsor of research in view of respondents (survey by CBOS 1992)]
Przybylowska, Ilona; Gostkowski, Zygmunt pp. 7-18
Article description | Article Full Text PDF

Identyfikacje z klasą średnią w pytaniu zamkniętym i otwartym [The class identifications by open and closed questions]
Domanski, Henryk pp. 19-35
Article description | Article Full Text PDF

Ankieta do ankietera: źródło informacji czy dezinformacji o wywiadzie kwestionariuszowym? [lnterview schedule for an interviewer. Is this valid information or disinformation about an interview?]
Sztabinski, Franciszek pp. 37-55
Article description | Article Full Text PDF

Socjologia a badania opinii publicznej [Sociology and public opinion research]
Kwiatkowski, Piotr pp. 59-62
Article description | Article Full Text PDF

Wpływ struktury kwestionariusza na uzyskiwane odpowiedzi w badaniach prasowych [Structure of questionnaire schedule and responses in mass-media research]
Dalbard-Martin, François pp. 63-70
Article description | Article Full Text PDF

Społeczna i kulturowa tożsamość kobiet [Social and cultural identity of woman]
Titkow, Anna pp. 73-77
Article description | Article Full Text PDF

Analiza zależności między zmiennymi kategorialnymi. Przykłady zastosowania programu GLIM [Analyzing relationships between categorical variables. Applications of the GLIM program]
Domanski, Henryk pp. 103-130
Article description | Article Full Text PDF

Browse

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Społeczna i kulturowa tożsamość kobiet
    (IFiS Publishers, 1996) Titkow, Anna
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Wpływ struktury kwestionariusza na uzyskiwane odpowiedzi w badaniach prasowych
    (IFiS Publishers, 1996) Dalbard-Martin, François
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Socjologia a badania opinii publicznej
    (IFiS Publishers, 1996) Kwiatkowski, Piotr
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Ankieta do ankietera: źródło informacji czy dezinformacji o wywiadzie kwestionariuszowym?
    (IFiS Publishers, 1996) Sztabiński, Franciszek
    This paper deals with the question of the utility of an interview schedule as filled out by interviewer after the interrogation. They regard it as a tool that helps to assess quality of collected data. I analyze, here, answers given by the same interviewers to identical questions, but coming from two different interview schedules as well as answers by different interviewers coming from the same interview. Basing on this I attempt to determine whether their reports are valid source in assessment of quality of collected information. Data come from reports given in Appendixes to interviewers in the Polish General Social Survey 1994 and from the methodological research as appended to the PGSS. I compare these reports taking into account: (i) missing informations and (ii) their credibility (extent to which answers given by the same interviewers to the same questions correspond to each other). The analysis shows that reports given by interviewer in an appendix to the interview schedule can by no means serve as a source of evaluation of collected data. It looks to be only preliminary basis in the assessment of validity.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Identyfikacje z klasą średnią w pytaniu zamkniętym i otwartym
    (IFiS Publishers, 1996) Domański, Henryk
    This analysis provides additional empirical support for a thesis that "open" and "closed" questions show to be two different but complementary forms of asking questions. I compare, here, self-identifications with social classes declared by respondents when asked in an open and in closed way in the two surveys carried out on representative random samples in 1994 and in 1995. It appears that self-identifications as received by a close question ("upper, upper-middle, upper, middle, working, lower") better correlate with objective class position of respondents than the identifications expressed "freely", in respondents' own terms. I argue that it has nothing to do with the validity of both questions. It simply proves that open and closed questions used to represent different social facts. Hence, recommended by some researchers strategy to employ the open questions in order to diagnose and pilot researched problem in preliminary stage of research may produce in some circumstances confusing results.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Problem sponsora sondażu w oczach respondentów CBOS w roku 1992
    (IFiS Publishers, 1996) Przybyłowska, Ilona; Gostkowski, Zygmunt
    The question to determine is what respondents think about making them known the name of financial sponsor of the research. We attempted to resolve this issue empirically, basing on the representative random sample (N= 1212). The survey was carried out by the Centre for Social Opinion Research (CBOS). It shows that 46,3% of respondents would like to be informed on who sponsors research. Predominant part of them (61%) disapproved anonymity of the sponsor. Respondents indifferent to this issue emphasized such reasons as: stability of their opinions. independence of their views, general lock of interests in "politics", general disapproval of surveys, and their adherence to pluralism. Information about the sponsor was chiefly sought for by respondents graduated from high schools. urban dwellers. more wealthy as well as those who had some earlier experience with survey research. Tiny fraction declared that they would have refused taking part in the survey if sponsor had represented political option which they did not support.