Popular Perceptions of Actual and Just Earnings: A Questionnaire Experiment

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/69603

Show full item record

Files Size Format View
ASK_2014_5_34.pdf 1.043Mb PDF View/Open

Title: Popular Perceptions of Actual and Just Earnings: A Questionnaire Experiment
Creators: Karpiński, Zbigniew
Keywords: actual and just earnings
do-earn and should-earn questions
reward expectations and referential structures
status inconsistency
methodological experiment
multilevel models
Issue Date: 2014
Publisher: The Ohio State University Libraries in partnership with IFiS Publishers
Citation: Ask: Research and Methods. Volume 23, Issue 1 (2014), pp. 5-34
Abstract: In social surveys, questions are often asked as to what subjects think people in various occupations actually earn and what they think these people should earn. Responses to these questions figure prominently in sociological studies on legitimacy of inequality and perceptions of justice. In the present study, responses to these questions are employed as well, but the major focus is on investigating the effects, if any, the way these questions are asked affects estimates of actual and just earnings provided by the subjects. More specifically, two hypotheses are proposed, the first of which concerns the association between actual and just earnings, as perceived by subjects, as a measure of legitimacy. It is argued that changing the order in which questions about the earnings are asked affects the strength of this association. A substantive justification for this hypothesis borrows from reward expectation theory and its concept of referential structures. The second hypothesis deals with between-subject agreement in the evaluations of just earnings and it proposes that the agreement may appear weaker or stronger depending on how the occupations to be evaluated by subjects have been selected. This hypothesis builds on expectations states theory, in particular, on status-processing principles in status-inconsistent situations.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/69603
ISSN: 1234-9224
Rights: This item may be protected by copyright, and is made available here for research and educational purposes. The user is responsible for making a final determination of copyright status. If copyright protection applies, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder to reuse, publish, or reproduce the object beyond the bounds of Fair Use or other exemptions to the law. We are eager to hear from any copyright holders who are not properly identified.
Bookmark and Share