OSU Navigation Bar

The Ohio State University University Libraries Knowledge Bank

Could Humphrey Have Gone to China? Measuring the Electoral Costs and Benefits of Making Peace

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/31836

Show full item record

Files Size Format View Description
schultz-kbdirect.htm 520bytes HTML View/Open Streaming audio
Kenneth Schultz 10-5-04.pdf 131.4Kb PDF View/Open Event webpage
Kenneth Schultz presentation.pdf 129.3Kb PDF View/Open Presentation slides

Title: Could Humphrey Have Gone to China? Measuring the Electoral Costs and Benefits of Making Peace
Creators: Schultz, Kenneth
Keywords: China
Issue Date: 2004-10-05
Publisher: Ohio State University. Mershon Center for International Security Studies
Abstract: Theoretical arguments for why “it takes a Nixon to go to China” emphasize either the superior credibility that hawks have in advocating peace or the superior political benefits they enjoy in doing so. This paper looks for evidence of these effects in the canonical case: that of U.S. rapprochement with China in the early 1970s. I use counterfactual simulations on data from the 1968 National Election Study to explore the political effects of a proposal to open relations with China, focusing on whether and how those effects would depend on who made the proposal: Richard Nixon or Hubert Humphrey. I find evidence of both the credibility and electoral security effects hypothesized in the theoretical literature. In particular, there is a very dramatic asymmetry in the political costs and benefits of proposing peace: while such a proposal would have been electorally costly for Humphrey, it could have been an electoral boon for Nixon.
Description: Streaming audio requires RealPlayer.
The University Archives has determined that this item is of continuing value to OSU's history.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1811/31836
Bookmark and Share